A quick over-eview of recent releases

I’m currently still away so still haven’t watched any new films, but to keep the ball rolling, I’m just going to give a real quick overview of my opinions of a few films I saw on the big screen in the last few months before I started writing again.

Lego Batman

For those of you who were following this blog back in 2014, you may remember I pitted The Lego Movie as a candidate for the best movie of the year. Although I wasn’t writing by the end of the year, it was a view I stood by. With the second movie in the franchise (however, not a sequel), I am again making this claim for Lego Batman in 2017. I was super excited for this one, and thankfully not disappointed. Much like in 2014 I actually got to an advanced screening of this and loved every minute. It was incredibly funny but also had some sombre moments and, despite a kids film, a decent exploration into the psyche of the main three characters, Batman, Joker and Robin. This was not only a great Lego Movie, it also was a pretty good Batman film. Most likely to be enjoyed best by “big kids” – e.g. people like me!

I really loved this movie and could say an awful lot more so I may revisit this for a full review later on in the year.


Free Fire

I had the chance to see this once again at an advanced screening (perks of the Cineworld unlimited card!). An interesting premise where the whole film is set in one location. Basically, what should be a routine gun deal goes wrong, and unfolds into what is essentially 80 minutes of back and fire gun fire. It seemed like it should be a lot of fun, and it was for a short while, but even at only 90 minutes, this film felt too long. I quickly grew tired of the monotonous back and forth fire which forced the jokes to become really stale. I think the filmmakers were trying to be too clever for their own good. A few big names were in the cast such as Armie Hammer and Brie Larson, but for me Sharlto Copley’s, Vernon, stole the show as a very enjoyable character to watch.

Not one I would recommend spending money on seeing – wait for a Netflix release.


Power Rangers

When I saw the trailer for this, I became quite excited. I wasn’t expecting a great film but was one I wanted to see for nostalgia sake, having watched the Mighty Morphers as a kid. As predicted, this wasn’t great, but enjoyable nonetheless. Filled up with pretty unimaginative cliches and a predictable story arc this film plods along at a reasonable pace without really throwing anything out of the ordinary at us. That said, there were a few moments that happened which genuinely had me smiling ear to ear – when “Go go power rangers” started playing at the perfect time – it was, I’m not ashamed to admit, a great moment.

If you watched the shows growing up, worth giving it a go even just for a few of those moments that will take you back to childhood and give you a huge grin on your face.


Beauty and the Beast

This was one I probably wouldn’t have seen if I didn’t have my unlimited card, but I am actually glad I saw it. I’d never seen the animated version but was pretty sure I knew the main plot points of the story. I have to say, when the first musical number started, I did have a brief look at myself and question what I was doing sitting watching this. However, when the second number started, and I suddenly found myself tapping my foot and smiling away to myself and realised – “dear god, I’m enjoying it”. Yes, I did go see this on my own, and I am once again – not ashamed.  This film has an awful lot going for it – it looked stunning, the musical numbers were catchy and well placed moving the story along nicely – oh, and Emma Watson. So much win for Emma Watson.

My one gripe, although not with the film itself, was that people clapped at the end. I don’t like when people do that – it makes no sense, who are you clapping for?! (sorry, it’s a pet hate!)


Ghost in the Shell

So, I saw the trailer for this countless times and even saw a 20-minute preview before the film came out. And I still had no idea what this was going to be about. Regardless, it had me intrigued, so I was quite looking forward to it. But, to say I was disappointed was an understatement. I found this film to be very slow moving and everything happened far too conveniently and seemed to wrap up to a conclusion before it even seemed like the problems for the main characters really got going. I’m usually a big Scar-Jo fan, but I didn’t really rate her performance in this. I haven’t been privy to the original incarnations of this story, so can’t say if it did it justice or not – my gut feel is it probably didn’t – unless the original also sucked.

Wouldn’t recommend this one – drab, boring and felt very slow despite not having a particularly long running time.


Going in Style

I’m a massive Zach Braff fan, despite not seeing him much other than in Scrubs (possibly the greatest show of all time!). This looked like it could be a bit of light relief fun, a story of three old men deciding to rob a bank after being screwed over by their old company who revoke their pensions. This film isn’t a classic –  full of cliches, is quite predictable, and makes a lot of easy “old man” jokes. But despite all that, it made me feel good, put a smile on my face and as expected, was a lot of fun. Not a great deal of thinking required and is a good one for switching off for an hour and a half and just having a good time. nice to still see the likes of Michael Caine, Morgan Freeman and Alan Arkin still on our screens, and Braff did a nice job in the director’s chair. Shoutout to Kenan Thompson who stole the show in the brief onscreen time he got, with some very funny scenes (always a soft spot in my heart for the hours spent as a kid watching Kenan and Kel!)

Not one to rush out and see but I would recommend it if you get a chance.


I’ll leave it there…

I have seen a lot more films this year, that I haven’t reviewed, but I will leave it there for now. I may come back and do another over-eview in the not too distant if I don’t have any full reviews to write. If you saw any of these films and want to let me know what you thought about any of them, feel free to leave a comment.

Peace out for now.





A cure for wellness… or disappointment

As I’m currently away on holiday, I haven’t watched a new film in the last week but didn’t want to stop the ball rolling when I’m just getting back into writing again. So with this review, I actually watched the film when it came out in the UK back in February, and wanted to write a quick few thoughts on this one as it has stuck in my memory – but not for the right reasons, instead as one of the most disappointing films I’ve seen so far this year.

A cure for wellness poster

I ummed and ahhed about whether to see this one at first, as it seemed like the trailer was potentially pitching this as a bit of horror – and as will be noted looking through the archives of this blog – Ben don’t do horror. I’m sorry but I’m a big wuss, and just won’t watch them – “A film so scary you won’t feel safe in your own home” and taglines to similar effect, sorry but I actually like to feel safe at home, count me out. Anyway – I digress. I ultimately (obviously as you’re reading this, hopefully!) decided I was going to give it a go as the storyline looked like it could edge slightly more into a psychological thriller, which is definitely up my street. After all, it looked a very similar premise to Shutter Island, which I really loved when it came out, so much so I saw it twice in cinemas. However, I’m sad to say the quality of A Cure for Wellness does not even come close by comparison.

The premise is a young employee on Wall Street is sent to retrieve a board member of his company from a wellness centre in the Swiss Alps, but when he arrives everything seems a bit odd and by an unfortunate and bizarre incident becomes a patient at the centre himself and is seemingly unable to leave, beginning to question his sanity. (See what I mean about Shutter Island similarities?).

The plot starts off seeming like it has some legs, but it never quite picked up the pace to fully get me on board. There were moments in there which got me on the hook but then didn’t deliver the punch to give me that “wow that was clever” moment you are dying for in a thriller. In fact, calling this a thriller is a bit of a stretch as it was in fact, far from thrilling. The story seemed clunky in places, with a lack of explanation on some points, simple giveaways that spoil the satisfaction of a “twist” and when it became obvious where the story was going (don’t worry – I’m not in the business of spoilers – keep reading…), I was left thinking “oh, that’s where we’re going, really?”.

The film wasn’t all bad. I thought Mia Goth played her role very well, and Jason Isaacs as the eerie Dr Volmer had his moments of walking the line between being trusted or not. I wasn’t keen on Dane DeHaan’s character of Lockhart, as although the lead in the movie I never warmed to him, and struggled to get behind him. I’m still not actually sure if that is intentional by the filmmakers or not? If you saw the movie let me know what your thoughts on the character were.

In fairness, the movie actually looked great – the production did a great job, the visual effects (for the most part) were very good, and some great locations were used to capture scenes in and around the wellness centre. By contrast, I seem to remember being not overly impressed with the use of music/sound in the film, which is a pretty important component in a psychological thriller. I may be doing it a disservice and misremembering, but as I don’t remember it being good, it probably wasn’t.

Running at just under 2 and half hours, this film more than outstayed it’s welcome. That said, making it 45 minutes shorter wouldn’t have improved it, but it would have meant I could’ve left earlier. Maintaining a sluggish pace for its entirety, it felt like a long 2 and half hours.

I had relatively high hopes going into this one, but instead of a cure for wellness, I was left needing a cure for disappointment.



Tonight I had the chance to go and see an ‘Unlimited’ screening of Jamie Foxx’s new movie, Sleepless. I say new, it seems as though this was actually released in the US back in January. I thought the fact Cineworld were showing this as an ‘Unlimited’ movie that is was an early screening, but now I’m not actually too sure?

I was really looking forward to this film – I hadn’t really seen a full trailer, but from what I had seen it looked like it was going to be a fun one to watch, plus I do usually like Jamie Foxx films. However, my spirits were dampened a bit when I accidentally saw headline reviews, and they were pretty terrible (I usually actually try and stay away from reviews all together before seeing a film so nothing is spoiled and I go in with a clean mind about the film). Nevertheless, at the end of the day reviews are only someone’s opinion, so I still went in with hopes I would disagree.

But, this film was only okay. It wasn’t terrible, but then it wasn’t all that great. Sleepless doesn’t really do anything that we haven’t seen before in a dirty cop film. All the ingredients are there – a drug deal gone bad, angry drug dealer, kid taken as a hostage, doubt over who can be trusted.

Although there a number of twist and turns, everything is all very predictable, and at times the film does give us a couple of too obvious clues as to what is going on. I found it quite difficult to real root for any of the characters, as the film seemed a bit confused about this itself. But, the film chugs along at a reasonable and very angry pace. Everything in this film is angry, all the characters seem angry the whole time, the soundtrack is angry, even the way the film is lit makes it look angry. While I’m mentioning the soundtrack, I actually thought this area was pretty weak. The film was trying hard to build suspense, but never quite hit

As is often the problem with mediocre films, everything just seems a bit too convenient. The character of Jamie Foxx’s ex seems to have been cast as a nurse just so she can show up at the right time when shots have been fired. And also happens to know how to effectively neutralise drug lords henchman? There are a few occasions as well where the film seems to have forgotten they have included things. For example, at time Jamie Foxx’s character can hardly move because of a stabbing, but later he seems absolutely fine, only for it to kick back into pain a few scenes later. And a hand that must be shattered by a fire extinguisher, also seems to be forgotten about, almost immediately.

Sleepless has a couple of big stars in there, in Jamie Foxx and Michelle Monaghan, it is just a shame we don’t get to see the best of them, as in previous outings I’ve really enjoyed them. I was also quite pleased to see David Harbour, as I thought he was great in The Newsroom series, despite only being a supporting role. Unfortunately, Sleepless doesn’t really get the best out of any of its stars, and this won’t be going down as one of their highlights.

One thing I will say for the film, is that I think it actually ends pretty well. Not that it is an amazing finale, but where a lot of films tie things up with a nice bow and everything has worked out for the best, Sleepless makes us think it is doing this, but then as the curtain closes, it tells us that although the story has finished for us, this isn’t the end for these characters who still have consequences to deal with. A nice touch you don’t see too often   – unless it is setting up for a sequel, which I really hope isn’t the case!

If this does have a wider UK release in cinemas, it probably isn’t worth your time. A shame, as i do usually like Jamie Foxx.

An average 5/10

Guardians of the Galaxy: Vol 2

I’ve been looking forward to this one for quite some time, but amongst my excitement, has also been a little bit of worry. You tend to find with these kinds of films, when there is a lot of hype, there is always a chance you will be disappointed. There is also the possibility that there will be some exaggeration of how good the film really is – because of what it is. I have to admit, I fell into that a bit when Man of Steel came out, letting on that I thought it was much better than it really was – cos it was a Superman film AND Nolan was involved.


But back to Guardians of the Galaxy vol 2. I’m a huge fan of the Marvel Movie Universe, and I am very pleased to say this certainly lived up the hype. (Yes, I really mean it!). I was reassured immediately, as the opening credit sequence is a beauty to behold itself. I don’t want to go too deep into the movie, because I really would recommend to just go see it, and enjoy yourself. So instead I’ll just pull out a few things as to why I enjoyed it so much. If anyone actually reads this, and does want to talk more detail about the film, just leave me a comment or shoot me a tweet – @benjoy93

  1. This film is really funny. Marvel seems to have progressively been bringing more and more humour into their films (with the odd exception), and I seem to remember when the original Guardians film came out, it was their funniest to date. Again this one didn’t disappoint and was very funny throughout the film.
  2. At over 2 hours the film doesn’t seem to lose pace. Sometimes you can watch a film and think it would’ve been better to have been a bit shorter. Although Guardians runs at two and a quarter hours, it doesn’t seem to hit a lull. That doesn’t mean it is action packed for the full 2.25 hours, but it remains interesting for the full length.
  3. Which leads on nicely to the next point, whereby I think this film does the characters justice. The sequel delves a bit deeper into some of the characters and we find out a bit more about their backstories, and who they really are. I mean some of it, we already knew without it being explicitly spelt out for us but it is nice to spend some time looking at the characters. We also meet a few new characters and we are set up nicely for the Marvel Movie Universe to continue to keep rolling.
  4. The soundtrack is absolutely on point. I think sometimes this element of films is often (wrongly so) overlooked, but actually plays a vital role. I thought Guardians got it absolutely spot on, pulling in old classics really well to move help move the story along, bring in some humour and also hit us in the feels. The original Guardians film had a great soundtrack, and Guardians 2 followed up with one just as good.
  5. Post credits. By now everyone knows you’re in for a little bit more once the credits start to roll in a Marvel film (with the exception of Logan, which omitted this for all the right reasons). We are treated to a whopping 5 – yes, you read that right – FIVE post credit scenes. Not all are that important, a couple are just humorous, but we get a glimpse of where Marvel could be heading for a couple of the future films. Make sure to stick around right until the very end of the credits to make sure you don’t miss anything.

Overall, I really enjoyed this film, and Marvel can take yet another one to the bank. You are pretty much assured to be in for a great movie experience when Marvel are involved. Definitely, go check this one out.


Boss Baby – Can I fire this movie please?

I’d been going back and forwards on whether to see this or not for a couple of weeks. On the one hand the trailers didn’t look great, but on the other I like to get value from my unlimited card, and although no Pixar, Dreamworks have produced some great films.

Having literally just walked out of the cinema, with that being said, this was not one of Dreamworks hits. I found this to be bitterly disappointing. You might be thinking, “well duh, your in your 20s, what did you expect?”. But, usually kids film she are actually pretty great, especially when you’re older. You can enjoy the silly kid it’s, while appreciating the jokes aimed at the parents. However, Boss Baby seemed to swing and miss for both of these. This film just seemed confused about how it was suppose to cater for both audiences.

The premise itself is a bit of a strange one to get your head around. I know this isn’t a “thinker” film, it’s about a baby who can talk and works for a company posing as a real baby on a secret mission for crying out loud. When I say premise, what I really mean is the ideas it explores (maybe I’m overthinking this, but I do think kids films also explore real life scenarios and  ideas to some extent).

Your initially confused if your supposed to dislike this baby for disrupting this kids life and taking his parents attention, but then you kinda think the (older) kid is being a brat and is out of line. But then you’re rooting for them both and hoping it works out (of course it does – its a kids film). Maybe I’m not sympathetic to the plight of an older sibling as I was the youngest of two?

I was expecting this to be pretty funny, but unfortunately the childish humour missed the mark (there actually seemed to be very little) despite a few little chuckles. The film felt littered more with jokes for the parents, which just weren’t funny and in no way a child would get – a joke about severance packages was made three times, of which it wasn’t funny, three times. As well as not being funny, it didn’t even really hit me that hard in the feels (despite it trying a little bit), which you can normally count on with a kids film.

Another gripe I had, and I’m sure I probably only picked up on this because I wasn’t enjoying it anyway – but there was some very lazy continuity moments in there from Dreamworks, such as an over spilled glass of milk being a-ok when you see it again 2 seconds later, and a pair of eye brows ripped off a character which reappear instantly. I think I’m being hyper-hyper critical now, especially as this is a kids film. I mean, does that really matter? No, it doesn’t. But the laziness still ticked me off a little. Just because it’s a kids film it doesn’t mean it isn’t important.

All in all I would say give this one a miss. I’ve seen a couple of kids films already this year, and this one is definitely the worst so far.

This has been really negative, and I appreciate I’ve probably activities this way too much for what it is! Anyway, I’m going to leave this there now as I’m about to go back into the cinema and watch the new Guardians of the Galaxy movie, which I am SUPER excited for!

Boss Baby – a measly 3/10

(PS this blog was actually written using my phone – the first time I’ve ever actually done that!)

Fast and Furious Week

With the recent release of Fast & Furious 8, it dawned on me that I haven’t actually seen any of the previous films. So, what better way to put this right, than by binge watching the whole franchise in one week, so I could watch the latest installment on the big screen.

Rather than go into great detail over these films, as there are so many of them, I’ll instead just give a short summary of what I thought of each one. So on Tuesday, I kicked off #fastandfuriousweek (unfortunately that didn’t start trending despite my constant tweeting of it – feel free to also check me out over on twitter).

fast and furious crew


The fast and the furious (2001)

I have to say, I was a little disappointed with the opener. I went into it kind of expecting this to be insanely action-packed most of the way through. However, I found this a little flat. Yes there are some action scenes, and some cool street racing, but it didn’t really get all that exciting for me until the last 20 minutes, but then the film is over. The basic storyline follows undercover cop Brian (Paul Walker) who gets involved with Dom Toretto’s (Vin Diesel) crew whilst trying to bring down some truck hijackers. What this film is good for though is setting the scene for the franchise. We meet a few of the characters who will appear throughout the franchise and the ending leaves it wide open for more films to build on this. Even if we don’t really get the true sequel until the fourth movie.

2 fast 2 furious (2003)

The second film in the franchise see’s Brian now relocated to Miami and wanted by the FBI following his actions in the first movie. Vin Diesel steps out for a little while, but instead, we get introduced to franchise mainstays (and one of my favourite characters) Tyrese Gibson playing Roman Pearce, Brains partner in crime and Ludacris as Tej, an ex’street racer friend of Brian’s. Obviously looking to lay low Brian gets involved in the Street Racing scene and is inevitably caught, but offered a deal to help the FBI out and receive a pardon (a running theme throughout the films!).

This film seemed to get going a lot quicker, and for me, there was much more to enjoy in the way of fast cars and action sequences of which I was expecting from the first installment. This is a follow on from the first film, but not a true-true sequel (which we get later in the franchise), but there are throwbacks to the first film and references that help to and backstory to relationships in this movie, and again ultimately set up the new characters for the rest of the franchise. In a not so often occurrence, a stronger sequel than the original movie.

The Fast and The Furious: Tokyo Drift (2006)

Now, this certainly isn’t the best film in the franchise, however… it is the one I was most pleasantly surprised by. As I went into this one expecting it to suck. No Paul Walker, no Vin Diesel (again!), no Tyrese Gibson, no Ludacris. Basically, none of the original characters. But, I stand corrected and this is actually an enjoyable film in the series.

This film sees’s troubled high school kid Sean out of chances, and to avoid juvie is instead sent off to live with his estranged father in Tokyo, with strict rules to stay away from cars. Of course, he doesn’t do that, and instead get’s involved in the drift racing scene, and mixed up with the Yakuza. A slight move away from the type of street racing we’ve seen in the first few movies, and no influence of law enforcement, whilst very similar this movie differs from the rest of the franchise. However, of course, all differences are settled behind the wheel of the car.

Not the best in the franchise, but still plenty of fun, and race sequences to keep us happy, and a welcome introduction to another mainstay character Han (Sung Kaan). We also get a tease of a return of Vin Diesel in a post credit scene. I was tempted to skip this one but didn’t as wanted to complete the whole series. And I’m glad I didn’t.

Fast & Furious (2009)

This one is a little confusing, to begin with as firstly we see Brian back working for the FBI, without that much explanation how after his antics in number 1, and then again in number 2. And secondly, we have the return of a crew member which tells us that the previous film does (Tokyo Drift) doesn’t fit into the chronology of the franchise as we may have first anticipated. However through the next few films mentions of Tokyo are made quite consistently, just to remind us.

As I mentioned in the summary of the first film, it isn’t until number 4 that we seem to get a real sequel to the The Fast and the Furious. Both Paul Walker and Vin Diesel are back for this one, to clash once again after the first film set us up perfectly for this to happen at some point. I just didn’t expect us to have two other films before we got to this. I enjoyed this one while watching it, however now, only a couple of days after watching it, I’m struggling to remember anything key from this one.

Fast Five (2011)

I was on a tight schedule to fit all these in, as part way through the week I realised I needed to finish by Friday to avoid having to take a day off from the binge. So I actually got up at 6 am to watch this one before going to work. I was worried I was just gonna fall asleep again and miss a lot of it, but it was such rip roaring fun all the way through, that didn’t prove to be a problem.

This was perhaps one of my favourite installments for a number of reasons. One being the introduction of Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson. I’ve always been a big fan of The Rock since growing up with WWF, and happen to think he’s also not a bad actor. This film also marks where Brian is actually a full member of the crew and not actually a cop anymore. Possibly the biggest reason though is that this is the film in the franchise the filmmakers seem to have finally accepted what these films are – utter ridiculousness. But that isn’t a criticism. I like that they are ridiculous, it’s what makes them so much fun!

Fast & Furious 6 (2013)

Good guys join the bad guys, who are actually good guys we want to root for. The good guys who are chasing them are actually bad guys, but wait! They’re now joining the bad guys )who are actually good guys) to hunt a real bad guy, who is an actual bad guy. Confused?

With a film franchise that has been running so long, and continues to use the same characters, I guess it is inevitable that their roles change as the story progresses. The crew just can’t seem to get away, everytime they seem o be home free, they are brought in for “one last job” (which we know is gonna keep happening until we’ve hit at least 10 films). I think this film has perhaps some of the craziest sequences of all 8 films, with my personal favourite involving a tank, a bridge, and an incredible diving save. Sheer madness. This film was definitely embracing the franchise’s insanity.

Furious 7 (2015)

Fast 7 is a strange one, as most people will be aware, Paul Walker actually died for real in a car wreck whilst the film was still being shot. This almost lead to the film being scrapped, but instead was continued without Walker and cleverly edited to be finished and give the character a fitting send-off.

There has also been a large running theme of Family throughout the series, but this film leans heavily on this, for obvious reasons. This film is almost more abut the relationships of the crew rather than the action. But that doesn’t mean this film still wasn’t a lot of fun and filled with crazy car action, as it certainly was. My summaries are getting very similar now, as in fairness, all of the films are pretty similar, however, that doesn’t really take away from the enjoyment.

The fate of the furious (2017)

So, here I was, a challenge that started on Tuesday, now sitting in the cinema to complete the 8th film on Friday. The latest installment this time see’s Dom (Vin Diesel) caught up in having to betray (kind of) his family and work for the bad guy. Once again we see past bad guys joining the crew to become good guys, a

It is clear from watching this latest film, and indeed as the franchise has progressed, that these films are a far cry away from its street racer origins. Although we see one race right at the very beginning, that’s it and the rest is an out and out action film which involves cars. And now it isn’t just cars. We’ve got planes, tanks, snowmobiles, even submarines. This is perhaps the most far-fetched story so far – seemingly each film pushing the limits of sanity a little bit further each time.

You’d think by now the franchise could becoming a little stale, but to me it didn’t feel that way. Yes all the films are slightly similar, but it doesn’t matter. These films are abut switching off and just enjoying them for what they are. Or perhaps I was just on a high from so much car action in 4 days. Who knows. All I know is I really enjoyed this one as well. And if you’re a fan of the franchise, you have to go see it. And if not – why not binge watch them all in 4 days, it’s doable!

Key takeaways

So, now the week is over, I’m not really all that sure what to do with myself. It was one hell of a thrill ride for a few days, and I’m definitely glad I did it.

A few things I have learned from the films…
1. Whenever there is a street race, seemingly there is always a disco happening at the same time
2. If you want to commit a crime, just be so good at it that the FBI need your help to catch others so you can keep getting away with it
3. Ride or die

Predictions for Fast & Furious 9 – definitely got to involve a spaceship, I don’t think there any other “vehicles” left!

Wow, what a week! #fastandfuriousweek

Is anybody still out there?

Is there anybody out there?


*taps the mic* Is this thing on?

Wow, I can’t believe it’s been over three years since I last posted anything! Life kinda got in the way – finishing Uni, moving down South, a few job changes etc etc…. I won’t bore you with the details. Long story short, I just had less time for movie watching, and even less time for blog writing.

However, now things have settled down, I once again find myself with more time for moving watching, and have really ramped it up over the last 4 months, getting through 55 films! (Yes I’m keeping track). I’ve kept saying to myself – “I’m going to start blogging again. I’m going to start blogging again”, but just haven’t done it. So, I’ve finally stopped saying it, and am going to actually try and get back into doing it.

Firstly, please bear with me! I’m a little out of practice, so might take me a little while to get going. I doubt I’ll be able to blog everything I watch but am going to try and maintain some regularity from now and going forward, like I had back in 2013/14. If I can get some time I will perhaps also go back and review some of my favourites that I’ve seen so far this year while I get going again. All my old reviews are still here if you want to give them a read in the mean time!

Secondly, I’m considering changing up the site, but that will take a bit of thinking about and some work as I would like to do it myself, rather than use a theme. However, that isn’t my speciality so that would take some time! I might use a new theme for a quick refresh but for now, but there may be some bigger changes somewhere down the line. Again, this is something I’ve been saying to myself I will do for quite a while, so maybe I just need to get on and do it as well. As it stands, at the time of posting this everything is exactly as I left it 3 years ago.

For now though, hopefully, will see a few more blogs posts and I’ll take it from there! See you soon.

See you soon.

Muppets Most Wanted … I wanted more [REVIEW]

When The Muppets returned to the big screen back in 2011, it was definitely something special. Writer and star Jason Segel got everything just right – he gave us the Muppets that we loved. It was silly, funny, charming and had a great deal of heart. I was unsure of what to expect with the sequel Muppets Most Wanted, as Segel has absolutely nothing to do with it. On the one hand, I was worried that his presence (and perhaps more importantly his writing) would be missed, but on the other how could The Muppets disappoint?


I am sorry to say that his presence and writing was in fact missed, and I was a bit disappointed with this latest Muppet effort. That doesn’t mean that it sucked, but it is not to the standard of Segel’s masterpiece.

The storyline for the sequel involves Kermit being mistaken for the Worlds most dangerous frog and #1 on the Most Wanted list, Constantine, a Russian criminal who looks exactly like Kermit. Kermit is replaced by Constantine as the head of The Muppets, unbeknownst to the rest of the Muppet crew, as he takes them around the world on his crime spree. There are chunks of the film set in a Siberian Gulag, filled with Russian criminals – there is a chance some will try and tie this into the current issues surrounding Russia at the moment, however this is nothing more than bad timing. This is a U rated film and has absolutely no ties back to the current events, so won’t we dwell on this aspect. 

constantineI think where Muppets Most Wanted falls down, is that this film is centred around, and spends the majority of time on a Muppet that we have never seen before, we barely see our original favourites, Kermit, Gonzo, Fozzie etc… and see even less of the 2011 protagonist Walter. Constantine is funny for a while, with his thick Russian accent, with the running joke that none of the other Muppets notice this. However, I soon tired of him, and was wishing to see more of the real Kermit. 

As expected, the film is ladened with musical numbers, with Bret McKenzie returning from the 2011 effort with more original songs. These are catchy, funny and incredibly witty – although in my opinion peaked with the first number as the stand out song in the film. The songs helped to pick the film up, and combat the disappointing elements of Muppets Most Wanted, as these get to show the strength of the Muppets, and just how entertaining they can be.

Also, as expected, the film features a number of cameo appearances – although I felt these weren’t utilized as well as they were in 2011, and weren’t quite as relevant. Where in 2011 I was left thinking, “Wow, it’s great they got them to be in this”, this time around, for probably at least 50% of the cameos I was left thinking “Huh, haven’t seen them in a while…”.


The Muppets always have great human characters playing alongside them, and this was sort of the case in Most Wanted. Holding my hands up as not the biggest Ricky Gervais fan (despite my love of The Office (original UK Version)), and although having his moments, he just didn’t quite do it for me. It felt like he was holding back, and the combination of him and Constantine isn’t a patch on Walter and Jason Segel. However, Ty Burrell definitely delivers in his role as Jean Pierre Napoleon, an Interpol detective paired up with Sam the Eagle. Burrell gives this role his absolute all, and is effortlessly charming, funny, and bounces off Sam the Eagle fantastically. Tina Fey is the third most utilized human in the ensemble and is more funny than she isn’t. Nothing to write home about, but a pretty solid effort.

Although I left slightly disappointed, Muppets Most Wanted definitely has its moments. Even though we don’t see nearly enough of our favourite Muppets, we do get glimpses of the Muppet brilliance. I usually aren’t a fan of the fourth wall being broken, however when the Muppets do it, I love it. They are great at acknowledging themselves for what they are, and when the fourth wall is broken, it is always funny. The film isn’t a total write off and at a few points did have me laughing out loud. Which I could do as loud as I wanted, as for the first time ever I had the entire screen to myself. Which I am still finding hard to believe as this was an advanced screening…

If you get a chance and are a Muppet fan (how could you not be?) you probably should go and see it, even if just to say you have seen it. You will at least get some enjoyment out of it, just not as much as you could have, and is still possible as proved by the 2011 film. You will also get the delight of a Pixar Monsters University short at the beginning, which is incredibly funny. Where the Muppets will go from here, I am not sure. Perhaps Segel did the right thing of quitting while the Muppets were still ahead. Hopefully the next effort will be better, although I can’t see Segel making a return to the Muppets – can anybody come in and fill those large shoes?

A mediocre 5/10






Heroes Reborn … Teaser Trailer Released – Excited? [TV]

Last night NBC surprised viewers with a Teaser Trailer for Heroes Reborn. The mini-series is set to air in 2015, and will have 13 episodes. The trailer gives absolutely nothing away, except letting us know that it is coming. We in fact no very little else about the mini-series, no story details have been released, however what we do know is that Heroes creator, Tim Kring, will be rejoining the show to exec produce, and this will feature its own stand alone arc.

Fans of the original show will sadly remember that this was cut short, being cancelled after the fourth season due to ratings for the show dropping. While I think the majority would agree that season 3 was disappointing compared to its predecessors, however season 4 was starting to redeem itself a little and was starting to rebuild some momentum. Although I was late to the show, while Heroes never topped its first season efforts, I was very disappointing when I got to the end of season 4 to find there would be no more.

*Spoilers to follow* – if you are interested in watching the original series – please don’t read any further! (Feel free to skip to the bottom to see the trailer)


It will be interesting to see where the mini-series will pick up, with season 4 ending with Claire revealing her powers to the world, a series 5 would have brought about huge change to all of the characters lives. However, we will now be 5 years on from this event, and I wonder whether the show will keep in real time, or will set its self a few yeas back. I’m imagining the series to start with a flashback to the end of season 4 and then be followed by the classic Heroes opening, with the title of episode – 5 years later. But I may be wrong.

NBC Entertainment  President Jennifer Salke has said in a statement that “Until we get closer to air in 2015, the show will be appropriately shrouded in secrecy, but we won’t rule out the possibility of some of the show’s original cast members popping back in.”

I’m torn as to whether I want to see any of the original characters. In an ideal world we would have got a season 5 and had the show appropriately tied up – however now we are going to get a new set of characters and any appearances from the originals are bound to be cameos at best, and run the risk of tainting the original characters. Perhaps it would be better to just start with a clean slate.

It will be interesting to see how this works out, with the original series fizzling out with a lot of viewers after season 2 before its demise at the end of season 4, will enough people be excited to see the show return? I will definitely be giving this a go when it hits the screens, however whether it can keep me interested or not, we will have to see.

How do you feel about Heroes returning, and which (if any) of the original characters would you like to see return?

Her … A thought provoking social commentary, likely to be the most underrated film of the year [REVIEW]

It would be easy to take a look at the synopsis of this film and write it off immediately. Which I fear may be the case with many, judging by the fact that this film was only released on the 14th February (In the UK), and when I saw it on the 15th, it had already been relegated to a small seater Studio screen … which was also empty.

I first read about this film about 6 or so months ago, and thought it was an interesting idea. My fear was that it would be too Lars and the Real Girl-ish … however, although comparisons could be drawn, Her, is very much its own film, and Spike Jonze has done a great job, creating an emotional and thought provoking piece that hints at where we may be heading, and jibes at where we are today.

her-movie-posterJoaquin Phoenix plays Theodore Twombly, a man going through a divorce, who in his loneliness purchases a new Operating System, OS1, that is designed to meet a persons every need, and has the ability to grow, learn, and make decisions – ultimate artificial intelligence. Theodore eventually falls in love with his OS, named Samantha, and pursues a relationship with ‘her’.

The film borders on Sci-Fi, and Spike Jonze has created a world that is not too far from our own. It feels like Jonze has placed this maybe 15 to 20 years into the future. Technology has advanced (obviously!) and people are engrossed with their electronic devices. Everything works like Siri, nothing seems manual anymore, but a reliance on computers to do everything, from reading emails out loud, writing letters on voice command rather than being typed, reading news stories, and even holding conversations.

The film, although futuristic, has an element of truth to it, which Spike Jonze is poking at. Although with all of the technological advancements that on the surface bring people closer together than ever before … human interaction is being lost. People forever have their heads in a smartphone, or a tablet or a laptop, rather than connecting with the people who are around them. I read a short, interesting article on this subject  the other day prior to watching this film, and it came back to my mind when watching Her. Throughout the film you see hundreds of people, all together, near each other, travelling together … yet almost everyone is engaged with their electronic devices and talking with them. Even Theodore’s job is to write personalized letters for other people – even people’s most intimate and close relationships are not being communicated directly with one and other, a complete stranger is playing a middle man. With, Her, Spike Jonze is holding up a mirror to society as we are now, and showing us where we are heading if we continue down this path. Of course technological advancement isn’t all bad – but Jonze is raising a very real point with this film.

Another thought provoking aspect of this film that Jonze explores is that of love. Love by its very nature is unpredictable, and the love between two people is often not understood by those outside of the relationship. On the surface, it seems like the idea of this film is crazy, and that the Theodore character should be branded as a ‘weirdo’ – however when the film gets going – for the most part, it doesn’t seem that strange. I did find myself torn throughout the film, at times feeling like this was ridiculous, and at others it seemed so normal. Yes, the OS is a program, she is not real – however she communicates like a real person, she presents real emotions, she makes unique decisions – she becomes very real, very fast. And the way that Theodore’s character changes when he is with ‘her’ is astonishing – before he is, whilst not broken, depressed and lonely – yet when he begins his relationship with Samantha, he becomes happier, care-free and begins to enjoy life again. And as an audience, who are we to judge? It doesn’t negatively affect anyone else around Theodore, and it makes him happy – so why is that weird, and why should he be branded as ‘weirdo’. I am talking from an audience perspective here … this is behaviour is accepted by most characters in the film, and it is referenced that Theodore is not the only one who is experiencing this.

But of course it is absurd right? … It’s a tricky one.

One way to look at it, could be that what Jonze is propositioning is, that we are becoming less capable of handling real emotions because of our obsession with electronic communication – losing that human touch is diminishing our abilities to communicate on a real level. You can say whatever you want through a text or an email and never have to face real response or consequence – Twombly remarks often in the film to the OS … “I can say anything to you”. This is idea of hiding from emotion is directly referenced at one point in the film, by Theodore’s ex-wife (Rooney Mara), which I think was added in to nudge the audience at what Jonze is trying to say.

The writing of this film is impeccable by Jonze, and as this film is mainly dialogue between the two central characters, Theodore and Samantha, running at two hours, it doesn’t feel slow (maybe for 10 minutes it slows, but picks up again straight away). Jonze has also done a great job in making the world look great … not too dissimilar from today – to hit home where we are as a society at present – but advanced this to be obvious it is the near future.

The casting is an inspired choice, Joaquin Phoenix is impeccable as Theodore Twombly – he makes you feel for him, laugh with him and is a character you will no doubt warm to. Scarlett Johansson is also brilliant, and although you obviously never see her, she sells the performance with her voice, and really does make Samantha feel real (did anyone else notice just how much she sounds like Rashida Jones?). Bearing in mind the two main characters are never together, it feels as real to the audience as it does to Theodore, and everyone involved has done a great job at creating this film. Supported by the likes of Chris Pratt and Amy Adams, you are reminded that human relationships do in fact still exist. The film yo-yos up and down emotionally, being biting funny when it wants to be, and then crushingly depressing.

Not only is this a great piece to view, it raises numerous very interesting, and real points to consider. I have a feeling this will be overlooked by too many, and is likely to be the most underrated film to come out this year. Spike Jonze has created a truly magnificent, thought provoking film … and if you have got through all of my waffle to here, I would recommend it to you!